Reasoning About Collectively Accepted Group Beliefs
نویسندگان
چکیده
منابع مشابه
Reasoning About Collectively Accepted Group Beliefs
A proof-theoretical treatment of collectively accepted group beliefs is presented through a multi-agent sequent system for an axiomatization of the logic of acceptance. The system is based on a labelled sequent calculus for propositional multiagent epistemic logic with labels that correspond to possible worlds and a notation for internalized accessibility relations between worlds. The system is...
متن کاملTractable Reasoning about Group Beliefs
In contemporary autonomous systems, like robotics, the need to apply group knowledge has been growing consistently with the increasing complexity of applications, especially those involving teamwork. However, classical notions of common knowledge and common belief, as well as their weaker versions, are too complex. Also, when modeling real-world situations, lack of knowledge and inconsistency o...
متن کاملChildren's beliefs about everyday reasoning.
Two studies investigated children's metacognition about everyday reasoning, assessing how they distinguish reasoning from nonreasoning and "good" reasoning from "bad." In Study 1, 80 1st graders (6-7 years), 3rd graders (8-9 years), 5th graders (10-11 years), and adults (18+ years) evaluated scenarios where people (a) used reasoning, (b) solved problems with nonreasoning approaches, or (c) reac...
متن کاملChallenging accepted ethical beliefs.
This month’s issue presents arguments on three longstanding ethical issues: prostitution, euthanasia and organ donation. It also addresses three issues perhaps more directly linked to daily practice across clinical care and research: resource allocation, consent, and, in an interesting pair of papers, how a clinician’s own experiences might affect their ethical judgement and therefore clinical ...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
ژورنال
عنوان ژورنال: Journal of Philosophical Logic
سال: 2011
ISSN: 0022-3611,1573-0433
DOI: 10.1007/s10992-011-9188-0